Personal Injury Lawyer | Business Litigation | Law Firm Washington DC | <em >Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, </em >477 U.S. 317 (1986)

Personal Injury, Business Litigation, Law Firm Washington DC

Personal Injury Lawyer Washington DC

This links to the home page
Cases + Briefs

Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986)

11/24/2015
Representing the administratrix of the estate of a worker who died due to asbestos exposure. This case was an appeal by the asbestos manufacturer to the reversal of a motion for summary judgment.

The Supreme Court held that: (1) Rule 56(c) mandates the entry of summary judgment after adequate time for discovery against a party who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party’s case as to which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial; (2) there is no requirement that the moving party support its motion with affidavits or other similar materials negating the opponent’s claim; and (3) the nonmoving party need not produce evidence in a form that would be admissible at trial in order to avoid summary judgment.

Briefs:
Brief for Petitioner
Brief for Respondent
Reply Brief for Petitioner